Performance Metrics
in Supplier Relationship Management
By
Ken Sloan, Principal
Over
the past few years, Supplier Relationship Management (SRM)
has gained significant momentum and leverage as a required
tool and process in the Supply Chain Execution (SCE) space.
However, the deployment of this technology is typically focused
on the technology application, which has left the process
end virtually unchanged. Yes, SRM does provide visibility
to supplier transactions and it does provide tools for automated
processes, and it can provide feedback on performance metrics,
but it does not manage the automation of performance metric
gathering or supplier feedback regarding performance compliance.
Performance
metrics is a direct result of a supplier compliance program
that is driven by a well-defined plan that is effectively
communicated with your suppliers. It is a key area of opportunity
for improvement. For example, if you have several suppliers
that consistently fail to comply with bar code standards,
then your receiving operations will spend a significant amount
of time placing the appropriate bar code labels on boxes ultimately
costing you time and money. A supplier compliance initiative
using performance metrics will help you monitor and manage
results at the supplier level and will provide you the details
you need for improving the performance of your suppliers and
the efficiency of your operations.
A very
simple, inexpensive and tactical approach to building a supplier
compliance program with performance metrics is through a process
that Tompkins Associates has termed as SMART:
- Specific
- Measurable
- Attainable
- Relevant
- Time-based
The goal
of this process is not only to increase your internal operational
efficiencies, but to also build stronger relationships with
your suppliers through well-defined and communicated expectations.
Specific
The first
step to the SMART approach is to identify and document the
specific areas of impact to your operations. This will require
a detailed process flow of your operation starting with the
actual purchase order and ending with the final receipt and
any other supplier specific actions that may occur after the
receipt such as quality control or cross-dock shipments. Within
each process step, evaluate your existing tools, procedural
requirements, and the amount of time and effort that it takes
your organization to complete that step. For both your organization
and the supplier, ask the question, "How can we make
this better, faster, quicker, easier, and more effective?"
Following
are some examples of process steps and typical questions that
should be asked:
Example
#1: Your first process step might be the purchase order.
If so, are you using a technology-based application that
allows for electronic distribution of POs or are you sending
faxes or calling in orders via the telephone? Can your supplier(s)
receive electronic transmissions? If not, what would it
take to enable them? Does it make sense to subsidize the
cost and assist your smaller suppliers in the implementation
of strategic tools?
Example
#2: The second step might be the supplier's confirmation
of the PO and shipment. Do you have the capability to receive
electronic Advanced Shipment Notices (ASNs)? If so, how
many suppliers are sending you electronic ASNs? If you have
a large number of suppliers that do not have the capability
to send you an ASN, how much is it costing you to work with
them and are there any alternative solutions?
Example
#3: Another area to examine could be receiving. Do you
require delivery appointment scheduling? If so, how many
suppliers or transportation companies are complying with
your requirements? What do you do if they do not comply,
and what is the overall cost to your operation?
Example
#4: You might have bar coding requirements. If so, is
there a particular placement on the carton that is required?
What is the quality of the bar code and read rate/accuracy
from suppliers? Do you require pallet identification?
Use your
completed detailed process flow and questions as a baseline
for developing a specific list of performance metrics that
you can deploy both internally and externally and then follow
the guidelines below to validate the feasibility and necessity
of each item.
Measurable
Performance
metrics are typically recorded and shared with your suppliers
in a quarterly report card. In order to provide a supplier
with a performance report, each performance metric must be
measured towards compliance. A scorecard is a great way to
keep up with the performance metrics and measurement criteria.
The scorecard should list each specific task and a grade range
that typically runs from one to five, with one being the highest
(best) and five being the lowest (worst).
After
each supplier receipt, the receiving department should use
the scorecard to complete a quick scoring exercise. Using
bar codes as an example, if all of the inbound cartons are
labeled correctly, then the obvious score for that supplier
on that task is a one. However, if the read rate/accuracy
is troublesome, then the grade would be lower and a discretionary
measurement will have to be made to determine the grade. Bear
in mind, that without this measurement process on the floor,
this issue may have never been reported and could be costing
you thousands of dollars in time and materials to reprint
and reapply labels. As a result of measurement, you now have
a mechanism that will provide management with a real time
tool that enables them to validate the savings of this compliance
program and will provide them with the data they need to work
with your suppliers to improve this process.
Attainable
Much
like goals, you should not create unreasonable expectations
or performance metrics. Be realistic in your objectives and
build a program that will provide real value to your organization.
For example, if you have thousands of suppliers, then it may
not make sense to have a reporting process for each one. Also,
you may have some small suppliers who cannot afford to implement
a computer or bar coding system, or you may have suppliers
that you only receive small quantities from on a seasonal
basis and it may not make sense to enforce this process on
them. So, select a manageable number of key strategic suppliers,
those that have the most impact on your operation, and work
from there.
Relevant
The relevance
of this exercise is simple. Will the results provide you with
recognizable value? Build a Return on Investment (ROI) equation
using the steps identified in the process flow by evaluating
the current cost of each step in terms of labor and related
expenses and comparing it against the projected savings of
the alternative solution. For example, if you are currently
manually transmitting POs via fax or the phone, how much time
does it take and what is the cost of materials and communications
versus the cost of implementing a solution that will automate
the process? And, what are the projected savings? If the ROI
is less than two years, the alternative solution is relevant
and should be implemented immediately.
Time-based
An important
aspect of a supplier compliance program is certification.
Your scorecard should be used not only as a measurement tool,
but also as a method for certifying your suppliers. Typically,
your suppliers should be averaging a grade of at least three
or higher (one is excellent, three is average and five is
grounds for dismissal).
All suppliers
who sustain a grade of one or two for a specified period of
time should be considered certified and can be removed from
the scoring process. There is no need for you to spend time
and effort monitoring the performance of a superior supplier.
Your focus should be on finding those suppliers that are causing
you grief.
Conversely,
those suppliers that are at a level of three, four or five
should be given a grace period for improvement on specific
tasks. At the end of the grace period, if there has been no
improvement, then you have to make a business decision as
to whether or not you can afford to continue to do business
with that supplier.
The chart
below can be used as guideline for working with time-based
results:
| Grade |
Certified |
Comments |
| 1 |
Yes |
Top supplier,
certified, long-term business partner |
| 2 |
Yes |
Top supplier,
certified, just a minor issue needs to be resolved, long-term
business partner |
| 3 |
No |
Valued supplier,
average performance, needs to correct some noted issues,
needs to have them corrected this quarter, has the potential
to be a long-term business partner |
| 4 |
No |
Below average,
needs to correct issues immediately or they will no longer
be a supplier, on the short list |
| 5 |
No |
Serious issues,
should not be a supplier |
Staying SMART
Use the
SMART plan as a guideline for building your supplier compliance
program. Communicate your plan with your suppliers and work
with them on the compliance and performance metric criteria.
Develop a realistic, measurable scoring mechanism that can
be transferred into a quarterly report card that you can share
with your vendors and promote the benefits of certification.
Likewise, have them provide you with feedback on your organizational
performance as you work towards a true win-win relationship.
Performance
metrics gathering, assimilation, and management will improve
your operational efficiencies, but it requires long-term commitment
and consistency in data gathering, reporting and communications
with your suppliers. Until you communicate and enforce your
plan, you will never realize the maximum results of an SRM
initiative.
|